<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bluereek limited &#187; social networking functionality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bluereek.com/tag/social-networking-functionality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bluereek.com</link>
	<description>Business and IT Consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:23:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Email to survive for some time</title>
		<link>http://www.bluereek.com/2009/10/email-to-survive-for-some-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluereek.com/2009/10/email-to-survive-for-some-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><span property="dc:creator" resource="http://www.bluereek.com/2009/10/email-to-survive-for-some-time/">Barry O&#39;Gorman</span></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew McAfee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking functionality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluereek.com/?p=471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew McAfee has been blogging recently on coexistence of email and enterprise 2.0/collaboration type tools in the enterprise.  His hypothesis is: &#8216;Within organizations, collaboration technologies are dictated by the most powerful person involved in the collaboration&#8217;. And following on from this, given the number of CEO&#8217;s wedded to email, would seem that email will continue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew McAfee has been blogging recently on coexistence of email and enterprise 2.0/collaboration type tools in the enterprise.  His hypothesis is: &#8216;<em>Within organizations, collaboration technologies are dictated by the most powerful person involved in the collaboration&#8217;.</em><br />
And following on from this, given the number of CEO&#8217;s wedded to email, would seem that email will continue to be the core communications/ collaboration tool for some time, in many organisations.</p>
<p>I think of the challenge differently.  The CEO operates in  a competitive environment, charged with delivering results for the shareholders.  If there&#8217;s a better way to run a company many CEO&#8217;s will be open to the change.  If there is a better way than email then it&#8217;s up to those who understand the alternatives to paint the picture.  There are plenty of CEOs out there who will switch tool sets if they believe in the benefits.</p>
<p>I think the idea of &#8216;email as the graveyard of knowledge&#8217; would be well understood by many CEOs.  In fact many would argue that email, computers, software, in general have been the graveyard of creativity, &#8216;spark&#8217;, stimulating interaction.  Notwithstanding this level of frustration I think many can see the potential benefits of &#8216;wiki-type&#8217; tools (incorporating social networking functionality) over some combination of email and Word/PowerPoint/ Excel.</p>
<p class="facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://www.bluereek.com/2009/10/email-to-survive-for-some-time/" target="_blank" title="Share on Facebook">Share on Facebook</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluereek.com/2009/10/email-to-survive-for-some-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

