<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bluereek limited &#187; amazon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bluereek.com/tag/amazon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bluereek.com</link>
	<description>Business and IT Consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:23:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>McKinsey &#8211; cold shower for the cloud</title>
		<link>http://www.bluereek.com/2009/04/mckinsey-cold-shower-for-the-cloud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluereek.com/2009/04/mckinsey-cold-shower-for-the-cloud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><span property="dc:creator" resource="http://www.bluereek.com/2009/04/mckinsey-cold-shower-for-the-cloud/">Barry O&#39;Gorman</span></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer facing applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McKinsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web facing presences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluereek.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McKinsey&#8217;s report of 15th April re cloud computing seems to be pointing out a few home truths re costs of cloud computing.  In fairness there are now so many variations in cloud computing (and more to come) that generalisations become a little pointless.  The Techcrunch review of the McKinsey report makes for interesting reading. Seems to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McKinsey&#8217;s report of 15th April re cloud computing seems to be pointing out a few home truths re costs of cloud computing.  In fairness there are now so many variations in cloud computing (and more to come) that generalisations become a little pointless.  The <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/mckinseys-cloud-computing-report-is-partly-cloudy/">Techcrunch review of the McKinsey report</a> makes for interesting reading.</p>
<p>Seems to me that variants of the cloud have real appeal for smaller businesses, businesses not sure how much processing power they require for their web facing presences and business experimenting with new customer facing applications.  Alos, wothout doubt, the ability to run &#8216;private clouds&#8217; will have its application.</p>
<p class="facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://www.bluereek.com/2009/04/mckinsey-cold-shower-for-the-cloud/" target="_blank" title="Share on Facebook">Share on Facebook</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluereek.com/2009/04/mckinsey-cold-shower-for-the-cloud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

